|
|
|

Home Page About Us Contact Us Our Procedures Our Location Our Physicians Frequently Asked Questions Educational Site Research Patient Forms Request Our Brochure Insurance Info
Why do doctors like to install prosthetics into patients? Click Here
The Cervical Artificial Disc
Just as there have
been artificial disc replacements made for the lumbar spine, there are ones for
the cervical spine. The cervical spine is significantly different from the
lumbar spine in that it requires a great deal of motion but generally carries
very little load. This mean that maintaining motion in the cervical spine is
very important but also that discogenic pain from disc loading is not as common.
More commonly, the cervical disc degenerate and lead to nerve compression. This
nerve compression leads to shoulder and arm pain. True cervical pain from the
discs is not as common but is definitely seen. The question is whether a
artificial disc is warranted in this situations, especially when endoscopic
cervical discectomy has a success rate of around 90% for such problems. The
device is somewhat similar to the lumbar artificial discs and consists of metal
plates with a silicon disc . Bending and flexion is maintained, but rotation is
decreased which is very important in the cervical spine. 
There are no good studies of this device and only one center is performing the insertion of the device on an experimental basis. The surgery is done through a standard conventional anterior cervical approach with a 2 to 3 inch incision.
The
device is held in place by two screws. There are no long term studies about
whether the device will loosen and possibly move. Although movement will be
anteriorly and thus there isn't any risk of spinal cord impingement, there is a
risk of esophageal or tracheal compression. This could possibly lead to problems
with swallowing or even possibly breathing which may necessitate removal of the
device and then fusion of the spine.
Thus, our concern is
that there may be no real need for a cervical artificial disc when the long term
success rates with endoscopic cervical discectomy or decompressive surgeries are so good. Nonetheless, This
disc replacement system may be a very good resort when endoscopic discectomy
fails. Nonetheless, we recommend an endoscopic discectomy prior to any fusion or
disc replacement therapy since the success rates are high and the risks are
lower than these more invasive techniques.

www.microspine.com www.microspine.net www.microspine.org www.doctorbuzz.com